More Pages: Hawaii Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67


Looking for a warm vacation?

smal colorfull diamant !!

A nice addition to any saltwater aquarium hobbyists' library

Very moving personal historyNearly 40 years later, William L.C. Johnson, a survivor of the explosions, asked another Navy man a by-the-way question about the event. One thing led to another, as they say, and within a few years, Johnson had collected dozens of first-hand accounts and photographs from eyewitnesses of the disaster. Out of those accounts comes this book.
William Johnson is no David McCullough, and this book will never be considered for a Pulitzer. It's not highly polished history -- it doesn't even, for example, get to the bottom of what really triggered the explosions in the first place. What this book is, however, is a very personal, and moving, labor of love, both for the author himself and for the many other men whose stories are told here.
In fact, the second half of the book is made up entirely of personal accounts from Marines, Army soldiers, and Navy and Coast Guard men who were there that day. Johnson also includes records of the Navy Board of Inquiry on the disaster, and the logs of several of the ships involved. These latter, especially, help illustrate the scope of the event, while the personal accounts demonstrate the chaos on the scene.
The West Loch disaster was, in the grand scheme of the war in the Pacific, a relatively minor event. It didn't even delay 'Operation Forager,' the invasion of Saipan for which the ships and men were being readied. But it wasn't minor for the men who experienced it, or for the families and friends of those who died. As the era, and the men who lived it, fade from view, this small book helps remember the men who gave their lives in action in May 1944.


Documents the Wilcox family quilt collection on Kauai.This museum publication is very nicely done and the photos of the quilts are great.


How the personal informs the political in the Aloha State.Like all memoirs (especially ones by politicians) there are self-serving elements to this book that make it worth reading with a grain or two of salt. At the same time, though, Governor Ariyoshi's focus really isn't on refighting old battles (in fact, I wish he'd gone into a little *more* political detail than he did). Instead, he's more interested in examining how his background as the son of Japanese immigrants, but born and raised in the unique political and cultural setting of Hawai`i, colored his worldview and approach to public service. 'Warm' and 'human' are the sorts of words reviewers always use for books like this, and I think they apply here. This is an interesting, informative, and at times, touching, book.
This book reveals some fascinating contradictions, not only in Hawai`i's political world, but also in Ariyoshi himself. For all his focus on compromise, moderation, agreement, planning for the future, and so on, Ariyoshi is an intense partisan. He is a loyal Democrat Party man, and his references to the Republicans are almost always derogatory. Toward the end of the book, for example, he describes the work of 'transform[ing] Hawai`i from a politically backwards territory to a progressive, multiracial state,' as 'the most essential accomplishment of the Democratic Party' (p. 200), as though social progress can only occur through the hand of government, and even then only if that hand is Democrat.
That brings us to an issue I wish Ariyoshi had addressed more directly -- an issue that is, in fact, the central fact of political life in the Fiftieth State: the state is ruled (it's not too strong a word) by an 'iron triangle' of Big Labor, Democratic Party politicians, and a bloated State bureaucracy. Ariyoshi admits (p. 199) that Hawai`i is essentially a one-party state, but --typically, though not entirely incorrectly -- blames the GOP for their own irrelevance.
He breezily dismisses criticisms of Hawai`i's regulate/socialize/bureaucratize/tax tradition as 'continental modes of thinking' (p. 126), without explaining why a free market is somehow unsuited for the Island State. Indeed, he notes that 'In Hawaii we have a tradition of highly centralized government that can be traced to Kamehameha's wars of conquest and the formation of the Hawaiian kingdom' (p. 128) -- an argument that reduces to little more than 'We do it this way because we've always done it this way.' Throughout the book, whether he is addressing the 1970s 'energy crisis,' economic development, affordable housing, diversification of agriculture, limiting the adverse impact of tourism and 'in-migration,' and the rest, the solution always -- always -- involves government.
In short, *otagai* -- 'We are obligated to one another' -- may well be true. But why that obligation needs to be met through the coercive force of government is a linkage Governor Ariyoshi leaves largely unaddressed. At one point, he quotes Lao Tsu that 'A leader is best when the people hardly know he exists, and of that leader the people will say when his work is done that "We did this ourselves."' (p. 96). Ariyoshi takes this to mean leaders should draw people in and get them involved in a common effort. But I always interpreted it to mean 'leaders' should, to the greatest extent possible, leave the people unmolested in the first place. That way, 'we did this ourselves' becomes literally true, and not an illusion used to camouflage the acts of the 'leaders' themselves.
Apart from these philosophical differences, though, I genuinely enjoyed reading this book. It brought back many memories for me, and more to the point, gave many valuable insights on both the process and the potential of political leadership. Low as my opinion of career politicians tends to be, I have to admit that if more of them were motivated by the kinds of ideals described on these pages, the act of politics might well be a less nasty thing. I even -- dare I say it? -- have a little bit of admiration for the man.


Take me to WaikikiThe problem, for me, is that the narrarator tends to be extremely condescending when describing many of the characters in the book, particularly the Hawaiian natives. The narrarator depicts most of the natives, including his wife, as ignorant and simple people. I found the "vignettes" focusing on this ignorance to be insulting, at best.
That being said, I am glad I read the book. If you can get past the author's condescension, this is a wonderful book full of rich characters.
Hotel HonoluluThe characters varied from local eccentrics to visiting scholars, who decided to become locals. It gave the reader an inside view of what some of the locals and tourists could possibly be like.
Sad and funny and very very human. I loved it!There's a wide variety of characters and a loose non-conventional plot. Most memorable of all is the larger-than-life figure of millionaire and hotel owner Buddy Hamstra, a big man who over-indulges his appetites in life. There's the writer's wife and daughter as well as permanent and temporary hotel guests and employees. It's a collection of vignettes interwoven with reoccurring themes and finely developed people. It's big and sprawling and full of pathos and humor, small portraits of human nature focusing on the themes of love and death.
I found myself drawn into it, enjoying the author's sharp observations and finding myself wanting to laugh out loud. How each character views this world is fascinating and the writer dares to ridicule it all. There's a power in the book that kept me reading in spite of the meandering pace. It's sad and funny and very human all at the same time as it willingly explores such topics such as ethnic tensions and physical disabilities. It might not always be a flattering picture of a place we sometimes think of as paradise, but it sure does seem real, as the characters grope and blunder along in their lives below a constantly shining Hawaiian sun. I just loved the experience of reading this book. Definitely recommended.


Emotional and haunting
Comfort WomanThis book opened my eyes to the terrible sexual abuse that took place during the war, as well as conveyed the importance of the mother/daughter bond and one's relationship to their past. I thoroughly enjoyed this book and highly recommend it!
Better than the others think

John Saul--PresenceVery similar to earlier, much scarier best-sellers such as "The God Project" and "Creature", this Saul novel is a little more subdued than many of his pervious works. The story takes place in Haleakala, Maui, among the best (and most volcanic) beaches in the world. Katherine Sunquist, an anthropologist who has come to the islands to study unusual skeleton remains gets much more than what she ever bargained for. Her teenage son Michael has just made the track team and is finally fitting in, yet his physical condition seems to be diminishing and she comes overly concerned. She becomes even more worried when one of Michael's friends unexpectadly dies while walking in the middle of the road. Katharine's biggest fears may become a reality as evidence shows that the organization she is working for may be putting all of its funds into an investment in medical terror--and Michael is the scapegoat. Not violent or scary, yet an intriguing novel none-the-less. Not one of Saul's very best, but certainly worth a read if you're a fan.
BIT OF A DISAPPOINTMENT
Reviewing "The Presence"

Pearl HarborBOOK REVIEW: The story was well-written and related to people growing up in the depression who were scarred by the events of World War I. The main characters were young boys when the story opened. They were the best of pals – like brothers. Each grew up to become aviators in the United States Army Air Corps. They always helped and watched over each other as the events of their lives led up to Pearl Harbor where they fell in love with the same woman.
Mr. Wallace’s story was historically incorrect in two areas. Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, Commander-in-Chief of the Imperial Japanese Fleet, remained on his Flag Ship in the Sea of Japan rather than with the fleet attacking Pearl Harbor. The other incorrect historical reference was that the United States did NOT declare war on the Third Reich at the same time as Japan but rather this event occurred three days later.
I would recommend this book for people who enjoy historical love stories. Jay O. Sanders was an excellent reader who held my interest and I finished the book in two days.
A good look at the Pearl Harbor battle
Great screen-play!Some people say the love story was a bit excessive and far-fetched. I agree. However, it does not take away from the extravagancy of the story of the bombing of Pearl.